Open letter to CNN; Subject: Iraq and Libya – “Good Guys” and “Bad Guys”/ Otvoreno pismo CNN-u; predmet: Irak I Libija – “dobri momci” i “losi momci”
23 October 2021Dear CNN “Friends”
I like your motto: “facts first”.
But, I am not sure that you really follow the moto.
It struck me when Chris Como was talking about Iraq and Saddam Hussein. He said something like:
“OK, we didn’t find the weapon for mass destruction (it was the reason for the attack on Iraq) but it doesn’t matter, Saddam Hussein was killed, he was bad guy”.
First, according to you it was OK to attack a sovereign country on the basis of false premises, on the basis of lies (not facts)?!?!?!
Iraq is destroyed, ancient sites have been damaged, hundreds of thousands of people have been killed, hundreds of thousands have been affected by war and left sick due to the usage of depleted uranium during the bombing.
Second: “Anyway, Saddam was a bad guy”.
Who decided that Saddam was a bad guy? What is the fact?
I would like if CNN could explain the following:
Why Bush, Bill Clinton and Hilary, Obama, Kennedy etc (the list is long) are considered as “good guys” after attacking Vietnam, Iraq, Libya, Yugoslavia, Syria etc. and leaving disaster behind, destroyed countries, hundreds of thousands killed innumerable sick and poor?
But, Saddam Hussein is labeled as a “bad guy” because he kept Iraq under control. During his regime the country was without poor people, without homeless people, with free education and health services.
He built new cities, infrastructure, roads, irrigation…
And, yes, we didn’t have ISIS during his regime.
A similar story is applicable to Gaddafi and the Libyan case.
Speaking of Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi it would be interesting if you give a comparison (using your sources and American Intelligence) of the following:
- Number killed during Saddam’s regime in Iraq, Gaddafi’s regime in Libya and number of killed during and after American involvement in Libya and Iraq
- Standard of living today and before American interventions
Regards
Branislav Kovachevich
Dragi moji CNN “prijatelji”
Svidja mi se vas moto: “prvo cinjenice”.
Ali, ja nisam bas siguran da vi stvarno postupate po tome.
To me je “strecnulo” kada je Krus Kuomo govorio o Iraku I Sadamu Huseinu. Rekao je nesto otprilike ovako:
“U redu, nismo nasli oruzje za masovno razaranje (sto je bio razlog za napada na Irak) ali, nema veze, Sadam Husenin je ubijen, on je bio los momak”.
Prvo, prema vama to je u redu da napadnete suverenu drzavu na osnovu laznih podataka.
Irak je razoren, anticka mesta ostecena, stotine hiljada ubijenih, ranjenih I bolesnih zbog upotrebe osiromasenog uranijuma za vreme bombardovanja.
Drugo, “…nema veze, Sadam je bio los momak…”
Ko je tu da presudi da je Sadam bio “los momak”? Gde je tu cinjenica?
Voleo bih da CNN objasni sledece:
Zasto se Bus, Klinton Bill I Hilari, Obama, Kenedi I ostali Americki predsednici (lista je dugacka) tretiraju kao “dobri momci” posle napada na Vijetnam, Irak, Libiju, Jugoslaviju, Siriju itd I ostavljajuci iza sebe pustos, unistene zemlje, stotine hiljada ubijenih, bolesnih I siromasnih?
A, zasto se Sadam Husein naziva “losim momkom” zato sto je drzao Iraq pod kontrolom. Za vreme njegovog rezima zemlja je bila bez siromasnih, bez beskucnika. Skolstvo I zdravstvo su bili besplatni.
Izgradjeni su novi gradovi, putevi, infrastruktura, irigacija…
Za vreme njegovog rezima nije bilo ISIS – a.
Slicna prica vazi I za Libiju I Gadafija.
Kad se vec prica o Sadamu I Gadafiju, Iraku I Libiji, bilo bi interesantno ako bi objavili poredjenje (koristeci vase izvore) o sledecem:
- Broj ubijenih za vreme Sadamovog rezima u Iraku, Gadafijevog rezima u Libiji I broj ubijenih u vreme I posle Americkih intervencia u tim zemljama
- Zivontni standard pre I posle Americkih intervencija
Sa postovanjem
Branislav Kovachevich
Studenti, Evropa i kako se to vidi sa recimo 15,400km / Students, Europe and how it is seen at a distance of 15,400 km
“Studenti”, Evropa i kako se to vidi sa recimo 15,400km
Vec skoro 9 meseci traju protesti studenata. Pocelo je sa nadstresnicom u Novom Sadu i “mirnim protestima” tj “davanja pomena” na najprometnijim raskrsnicama (prvo Beograda a onda i sire). Pitao sam se (a i na mrezama postavljao pitanja) zasto studenti odaju pocast izginulima na raskrsnicama a ne, recimo, u anfiteatru sto bi bilo normalno za studente a i ne bi ni remetilo red i mir. Nisam dobio odgovor.
Danas, devet meseci kasnije, niko vise i ne spominje nadstresnicu ali “mirni protesti” i dalje traju; problematican je nastavak rada na fakultetima, ometa se saobracaj, izbijaju sukobi, napada se milicija prilikom zavodjenja reda...
Koji su rezultati postignuti u ovih 9 meseci? Ono sto ja vidim (sa distance od 15,400km) je sledece:
- Mnogi studenti su izgubili godinu (sto povlaci izgubljen novac za studiranje, eventualnu promenu fakulteta ili prestanak studija, izgubljeni studenskih krediti, mesto u studnskom domu i sl)
- Napravljen je jos veci jaz izmedju onih koji “podrzavaju” i oni koji “ne podrzavaju”
- Dovodi do sukoba i onih koji su bili na istoj stani ali se ne slazu oko nacina na koji se protesti odbijaju.
Narod se podelio na
- “studente” i one koji PODRZAVAJU (nije vazno sta), na jednoj strani i na
- “cace” i “botove” na drugoj. To spadaju svi ostali:
- Oni koji NE PODRZAVAJU
- Oni koji podrzavaju ideju ali ne i nacin ostvarivanja iste
- Oni koji ne znaju tacno o cemu se radi i postavljaju pitanja i razmisljaju o tome “sta posle” (jer, sta ima da se pita i da se razmislja? Ima tu ko da razmislja. Ni “studenti” ne razmisljaju vec samo rade ono sto im se kaze.)
Ovde moram da napravim malu digresiju. Kada sam u pocetku postavljao pitanje sta se to podrzava i zbog cega su protesti, uglavnom sam dobijao odgovore kao: “borba protiv korupcije”, “za bolji zivot”, “da institucije sistema rade svoj posao” i sl. To se moze primeniti na skoro sve zemlje sveta. E, sada kada bi trebalo na to pitanje odgovoriti kokretno i sta se ocekuje posle (eventualno uspesnih protesta), verujem da bi od 100 ispitanih dobili 100 razlicitih odgovora.
Vidim da su “nasa deca” podelila i nas matore. Ljudi su poceli da se svadjaju jer ne misle isto. Sve se promenilo. Nekada smo bili protiv “jednoumlja” a, danas, izgleda da ko ne misli isto (kao oni koji “PODRZAVAJU” ili kao oni koji “NE PODRZAVAJU”) odmah postaje neprijatelj. (Mi, Srbi, i kada mislimo isto, naci cemo razlog da se ne slozimo). Nema dijaloga, nema SUKOBA MISLJENJA vec samo - SUKOBA.
Istomisljenici se medjusobno podrzavaju i sugerisu “objektivne” medije jer oni “drugi mediji” su “u rukama rezima”, “u rukama stranih placenika i finansirani iz inostranstva” i sl. Posle preko 40 godina zivota van Srbije, na 3 kontinenta i 5 zemalja, jedna od stvari koje sam naucio je: MEDIJIMA NE TREBA SLEPO VEROVATI. Vise puta sam bio u situacijama kada sam svojim ocima video jedno a u medijima je objavljena sasvim drugacija slika. Pitanje je: kome se moze verovati? Po meni: NIKOM. I ovi “obavesteni” kao i oni “neobavesteni” ne znaju sta se stvarno dogadja. A, o tome sta se planira “posle”, ne verujem da zna bilo ko izuzev onih koji iza kulisa vuku konce.
U principu, podrzavam ideju: “borba protiv korupcije”, “za bolji zivot” itd ali, nacin ostvarivanja te ideje a, pogotovu nejasni ciljevi (i, eventualni program sta posle) je vec drugo pitanje.
Evropa
U vise navrata sam pitao, na vise platformi, izmedju ostalog i:
- sta je konkretan cilj protesta?
- kakav je plan?
- sta/ko posle? (pod pretpostavkom da, recimo, ova vlast kaze:” dobro, evo vam vlast, sta cete sada”?)
Nisam dobio odgovre izuzev da sam uglavnom etiketiran kao “bot” (jer kao sto napomenuh ranije, sta ja tu imam nesto da pitam? Samo “cuti i “podrzavaj”).
Iz vise izjava protestanata i politicara koji su im naklonjeni a i iz njihovog delovanja (odlaska u Strazbur), mogao sam da zakljucim da su oni, izmedju ostalog, za:
- priznavanje Kosova
- priznavanje Srba kao genocidnog naroda (Srebrenica)
- ulazak u EU
Iluzorno je komentarisati prve dve tacke, (cak i ne verujem u to sto citam) ali bih dao svoje misljenje i prokomentarisao pitanje Evrope.
Kada je pocela prica o Evropi, mislim ranih osamdesetih, smatrao sam da je logican i jedini put Srbije – Evropa i, da je samo pitanje vremena kada ce se to i ostvariti. Medjutim, kako je vreme odmicalo a, pogotovu zadjnih nekoliko godina, promenio sam misljenje:
Protiv sam ulaska u OVAKVU Evropu (a, i nije da nas oni bas i zele). Ulazak u OVAKVU EVROPU NE PODRZAVAM!!!
Evropu, gde vecina vodecih zemalja podrzava samostalnost Kosova
Evropu, koja trazi od Srbije izvinjenje Hrvatskoj i placanje reparacija (a, sve posle “Oluje”)?!?!?!
Evropu u kojoj glavnu rec vode Von Ursula, potomak fasiste, Merc i izvitopereni Makron.
Evropu, koja je postala americki sluga i vodi Americki rat u korist svoje stete
Evropu, koja “doliva ulje na vatru” u Ukrajini i spremna je da se bori protiv Rusije do poslednjeg Ukrajinca i prakticno vodi u III svetski rat
Evropu, koja konstantno radi u korist svoje stete protv Rusije; kupuje skupe energente od USA, kupuje oruzje od USA da bi ga slala u Ukrajinu, snosi ogromne troskove (i sama slabi) samo da bi naskodila Rusiji.
Evropu koja podrzava “medjunarodno pravo” i Izrael, unistavanje i genocid u pojasu Gaze (i aneksiju iste)
Evropu koja podrzava “preventivne” napade Amerike i Izraela na Iran (a, koga je to Iran do sada napadao?)
Neka hvala, TAKVA Evropa mi se smucila. Ne dao Bog da budemo deo TAKVE Evrope.
I, jos jednom, ako je TO deo programa “studenata”, to NE PODRZAVAM!
Kako se to radi u svetu?
A protesti...ima ih svugde. Ima ih i u Australiji. Ovde se zakazu za odredjeni dan i odredjeno vreme. Traju 2, 4 sata ili citav dan. Proteste uglavnom vode strukovni sindikati. Dovoljno da se stavi vlasti na znanje da nesto mora da se menja. A vlast, menja se na izborima. Ne znam ni jednu zemlju koja je tolerisala proteste 9 meseci.
Naravno, negde se protesti i produzavaju ali treba videti kako to regulisu “istaknute, osvedocene zapadne demokratije” kao USA, Francuska, Nemacka...
Mislim da je pogresno da se problemi resavaju i vlast menja na ulici. To smo vec imali. Ne bi bilo dobro da udje u naviku.
Ocekujem komentare u smislu: “Ne vidis dobro jer je daljina velika”.
Tacno. Slazem se. Zato sam i postavljao pitanja (i dalje ih postavljam).
"Students", Europe and how it is seen at a distance of 15,400 km
For almost 9 months now, "student’' protests have been going on. It started with a canopy in Novi Sad (collapsed and killed 14 people) and "peaceful protests" or "commemorations" at the busiest intersections (began first in Belgrade and then beyond). I wondered (and asked questions on social media) why students are paying tribute to the fallen at intersections instead of, say, in the amphitheater, which would be more appropriate for students and would not disrupt order and peace. I did not get an answer.
Today, nine months later, no one even mentions the canopy anymore, but the "peaceful protests" continue; traffic is disrupted, conflicts break out, and the police are attacked while trying to restore order...
What results have been achieved in these 9 months? What I see (at a distance of 15,400 km) is the following:
- Many students have lost a year (which means lost money, a potential change of faculties or dropping out, lost student credits, a place in student housing, etc.)
- An even greater division has been created between those who "support" and those who "do not support".
- It leads to conflicts even among those who were on the same side but do not agree with the way in which the protests are conducted.
The people are divided into
- "students" and those who SUPPORT (it doesn't matter what) on one side and
- "caci" and "bots" on the other side. Those are all the others:
- Those who DO NOT SUPPORT
- Those who support the idea but not the way of achieving it
- Those who don't know exactly what it's about and ask questions and think about "what's next" (because, what is there to ask and think about? There are those who will think about it. The "students" don't think either, they just do what they're told.)
Here I must make a small digression. When I initially asked the question of what is being supported and why the protests are happening, I mostly received answers like: 'fight against corruption', 'for a better life', 'for the institutions of the system to do their job', and so on. It is a good cause but, this can be applied to almost all countries in the world. Now, when it comes to answering that question specifically and what is expected afterward, I believe that from 100 respondents you would get 100 different answers.
I see that 'our children' have also divided us old folks. People have started to argue because they do not think the same. Everything has changed. Once we were against “unanimity” but today it seems that anyone who does not think the same (as those who 'SUPPORT' or as those who 'DO NOT SUPPORT') immediately becomes an enemy. (We, Serbs, even when we think alike, will find a reason to disagree). There is no dialogue, there is no CONFLICT OF OPINIONS but only - CONFLICT.
Like-minded people support each other and suggest "objective" media because those "other media" are "in the hands of the regime," "in the hands of foreign mercenaries and funded from abroad," and so on. After over 40 years of living outside Serbia, on 3 continents and in 5 countries, one of the things I have learned is: MEDIA SHOULD NOT BE BLINDLY TRUSTED. I have been in situations many times when I saw one thing with my own eyes, but the media published a completely different picture. The question is: who can be trusted? In my opinion: NO ONE. Both these "informed" and those "uninformed" do not know what is really happening. And regarding what is planned "afterward," I don't believe anyone knows except those who pull the strings behind the scenes.
In principle, I support the idea of 'fighting against corruption', 'for a better life', etc., but the way of achieving that idea and especially the unclear goals (and the eventual program for what comes next) is another issue.
Europe
On several occasions, I have asked, on multiple platforms, among other things:
- what is the specific goal of the protest?
- what is the plan?
- what/ who comes next? (assuming that, for example, this government says: 'Okay, here you go, what will you do now?')
I have not received answers except that I have mostly been labelled as a 'bot'.
From various statements by the protesters and politicians sympathetic to them, as well as from their actions (going to Strasbourg), I could conclude that they, among other things, are in favour of:
- recognizing Kosovo
- recognizing Serbs as a genocidal nation (Srebrenica)
- joining the EU
It is illusory to comment on the first two points (I don't even believe what I am reading), but I would like to give my opinion and comment on the question of Europe.
When the story about Europe began, I think in the early eighties, I considered that the logical and only path for Serbia was Europe, and that it was just a matter of time before it would happen. However, as time went on, especially in the last few years, I changed my mind:
I am against joining THIS Europe (and it's not that they really want us). I DO NOT SUPPORT joining THIS EUROPE!!!
A Europe where most leading countries support the independence of Kosovo
A Europe that asks Serbia for an apology to Croatia and for paying reparations to Croatia (all after "Operation Storm")?!?!
Europe where the main role is played by Von Ursula, a descendant of a fascist, Merc, and the Macron.
Europe that has become an American servant and is fighting an American war to its own detriment.
Europe that "adds fuel to the fire" in Ukraine and is ready to fight Russia to the last Ukrainian, practically leading to World War III.
Europe that constantly works against its own interests towards Russia, buying expensive energy from the USA, purchasing weapons from the USA to send to Ukraine, incurring huge costs (and weakening itself) just to harm Russia.
Europe that supports "international law" and Israel, destruction and genocide in the Gaza Strip (and its annexation).
Europe that supports America's and Israel's "preventive" attacks on Iran (but who has Iran attacked so far?)
No, thank you, I am fed up with THAT Europe. God, forbid we become a part of SUCH Europe.
And once again, if THIS is part of the 'students' program, I DO NOT SUPPORT IT!
How is it done in the world?
Protests... they are everywhere. There are also some in Australia. Here, they are scheduled for a specific day and time. They last for 2, 4 hours or an entire day. The protests are mostly led by professional unions. It's enough to let the authorities know that something needs to change. And the authorities change through elections. I don’t know any country that has tolerated protests for 9 months.
Of course, protests are extended somewhere, but we need to see how the 'prominent, established Western democracies' like the USA, France, Germany regulate this...
I think it is wrong to solve problems and change the government on the street. We have already been through that. It wouldn’t be good to get used to it.
I expect comments like: 'You don't see well because the distance is great.'
True. I agree. That's why I was asking questions (and I still am).
Cat problem / Problem sa mackom
Cat problem
It was Friday afternoon, 11 June 2021. Somebody was knocking at the door. I didn’t expect anybody taking in consideration the restriction due to Covid 19. In front of the door was a woman in Brimbank City Council uniform. The serious expression on her face was a sign that a big problem was in question. In her hand, she was holding a small collar, probably belonging to a cat. She kindly introduced herself, explained where she was coming from and asked politely: “Do you recognise it?” showing the collar.
I didn’t recognise it but my wife said that it most probably belongs to some of our cats. I was still waiting to see what the problem is. Finally, the mystery was solved. Apparently, our cat was noticed in a neighbour’s backyard where the collar was found. The neighbour informed the Brimbank City Council about the incident. At first, I was surprised by the problem. And then, I felt a kind of happiness. If, at the moment, the biggest problem is my cat noticed in the neighbour’s backyard, and the City Council is devoted to solving the “problem”, it means that all other problems are already solved.
My first thought was that I chose the right country to live in.
The Brimbank City Council officer recommended that I should not allow my cat to go to the neighbor’s backyard. If I am not able to control the cat, I should make an enclosure for the cat or put it in a cage or put electrical fence around the house. Otherwise, they will set a trap and catch the cat. She didn’t explain what they would do next.
Then, I remembered the other cases in connection to the Brimbank City Council and their “concerns” about the citizens.
Case 1.
In 2007 my daughter was attacked around 50m from our house, while taking our two dogs for a walk (small breeds Maltese and Silky terrier). They were attacked by two pit bull terriers, at that time a banned breed in Australia). My daughter suffered wounds and scratches, Jack (silky terrier) was literary torn (internal organs were torn to such extent that he was put to sleep in hospital that night), Brandy (Maltese terrier) was wounded and covered with blood but he survived. The pit bull terriers, that attacked our daughter, were free, without leashes and the owner was not around.
The Brimbank City Council was informed but never I heard from them nor heard what happened next. Actually, they gave the details of our daughter to the attacking dogs’ owner who kept on harassing her for some time after the incident.
Case 2.
From 2007 till 2017 our neighbours were listening to the music too loud almost every day, all day long. The music was so loud that my daughters were not able to study. Even with closed windows, we were not able to watch TV normally, listen to the radio or communicate with telephone. Basses were so strong that vibrations were felt throughout the house. The music was lasting for all day long and sometimes during the nights. The source of music was sometimes in the house, sometimes the covered are in the backyard, sometimes front yard (from the car with 1100W strong subwoofer). For a few years they let the caravan (situated in their back yard next to our fence). It was the source of loud music too even at times when there was nobody in the caravan. We informed The Brimbank City Council about that and asked for a help. They asked me to make a diary with precise dates and times when loud music occurs. When I told them that I already had a diary, their response was:
– They can’t do anything because the source of music is in the private property. If it was in the public area (street, park etc) they would be able to intervene.
– The neighbor had the right to listen to loud music
Now, I started thinking about the cases.
1. When banned breed of dogs, unleashed, attack a teenager on the street (public property) and kill properly registered and leashed dog, this is OK. Not only that, the owner of the attacker dogs is informed about the victim’s address. But, when my cat is noticed in the neighbour’s backyard (private property) , The Brimbank City Council jumps in immediately to “solve” the problem.
2. The neighbor, who doesn’t work and who lives on taxpayer’s (my) money, has the right to listen to the loud music all day long (and often during night). My daughters don’t have the right to study and prepare for exams in a quiet atmosphere. Actually, he has more right to listen to the loud music than them to study.
Now, I ask myself: Who is the crazy one here? Am I missing something?
Which kind of society is it?
Anyway, something is not normalProblem sa mackom
Petak po podne, 11.06.2021. Neko kuca. Ne ocekujem nikog obzirom na restrikcije zbog Covd-19. Otvaram vrata I, vidim, zena u uniformi Brimbank City Council-a (to bi bilo kao sluzbenik opstine kod nas). Ozbiljno lice (sto bi bio znak da je u pitanju veliki problem), drzi u ruci ogrlicu koja je (obzirom na velicinu) pripadala verovatno macki. Posto se lepo predstavila tj objasnila odakle dolazi, pita uljudno: ”Da li je prepoznajete?”
Ja ne prepoznajem ali supruga rece da verovatno pripada jednoj od nashi macaka. Ja cekam da vidim u cemu je problem. Napokon, misterija je razjasnjena: Navodno, nasa macka je primecena u susedovom dvoristu, cak je tamo ostavila ogrlicu, I sused je slucaj prijavio opstini (Brimbank City Council). U prvom trenutku bio sam iznenadjen problemom. Onda, sam odjednom osetio srecu. Jer, ako je sada njaveci problem to sto je moja macka primecena u susednom dvoristu (I da je opstina resena da I taj “problem” resi) onda znaci da su svi ostali problemi reseni.
Moja prva pomisao je bila: Odabrao sam pravu zemlju za zivot.
Sluzbenik opstine mi je preporucio da ubuce “ne dozvolim” macki da ide u tudja dvorista. A, ako nisam u stanju da to uradim, da macku stavim u kavez ili da stavim elektricnu ogradu oko kuce. U suprotnom, oni ce postaviti zamku I uhvatiti je. Nije mi objasnjeno sta se posle toga desava.
Onda sam se setio drugih slucajeva vezanih za Brimbank City Council I njihovu “brigu” o stanovnicima.
Slucaj 1.
2007 god moja cerka je napadnuta na pedesetak metara od nase kuce dok je vodila nasa dva psa u setnju (u pitanju je vrsta malih pasa: moltezer I silky terrier). Napali su nju I nase pse dva pit-bull terijera (koji su I u to vreme bili zabranjena rasa u Australiji). Cerka je bila sva ugruvana I izgrebana. Dzek (silky terrier), je rastrgnut; unutrasnji organi su mu pokidani do te mere da je iste noci uginuo, tj morao je da bude uspavan u bolnici jer mu nije bilo spasa. Brandy (maltezer), je zadobio povrede, bio je sav krvav, ali je preziveo.
Psi, koji su napali nasu cerku I pse, su bili slobodni tj nisu bili vezani I bez vlasnika na vidiku.
Slucaj je prijavljen Brinbank City Council ali nikada nismo saznali sta se posle toga desavalo izuzev da je Council dao vlasniku pasa adresu moje cerke I on ju je kasnije uznemiravao.
Slucaj 2.
Od 2007 do 2014 godine, nasi susedi su skoro svakodnevno pustali glasnu muziku po ceo dan. Jacina je bila tolika da cerke nisu mogle normalno da uce u kuci. I pored zatvorenih prozora, nismo mogli normalno da pratimo TV I radio program niti normalno da komuniciramo telefonom. Basovi su bili takvi da su se vibracije osecale u citavoj kuci. Muzika je trajala po ceo dan a ponekada I nocu. Izvor je bio nekada u susednoj kuci, nekada pokriveni deo zadnjeg dvorista, nekada prednje dvoriste (auto sa 1100W jakim subwooferom). Jedno vreme su izdavali kamp kucu koja je bila u zadnjem dvoristu neposredno uz nasu ogradu. Odatle je glasna muzika dolazila cak I kada (izgleda) tu nije bilo nikoga.
Obratili smo se za pomoc Brimban City Council-u. Prvo su trazili da vodim dnevnik. Kada sam im rekao da dnevnik vec imam (sa tacnim vremenom kada je muzika bila glasna), obavestni smo da:
– Oni tu ne mogu nista da urade jer je izvor muzike privatno vlasnistvo (da je na javnoj povrsini tj na ulici ili u parku, onda bi mogli da intervenisu)
– Sused ima pravo da slusa glasnu muziku
Sada sam poceo da razmisljam o slucajevima:
1. Kada zabranjena vrsta pasa, bude pustena sa lanca I napadne tinejdzera na ulici I usmrti redovno registrovanog I vezanog psa onda je to – OK. Ne samo da je OK vec City Council obavesti vlasnika zabranjene vrste pasa o adresi zrtve. Ali, kada moja macka, bude primecena u susednom dvoristu, e, to je onda veliki problem I City Council mora odmah da reaguke kako bi se problem resio.
2 Sused, koji ne radi I koga ja, kao onaj koji placa taksu, prakticno izdrzavam, ima parvo da slusa glasno muziku po citav dan (I cesto nocu). Moje cerke, nemaju parvo da uce I spremaju ispite u odgovarajucoj atmosferi. U stvari, on ima vise prava da slusa glasnu muziku nego one da uce.
Sada se pitam ko je ovde lud? Da li je problem u meni I ja ne vidim nesto sto je ocigledno.
Koje je ovo drustvo?
Ovde nesto nije normalno.
kovachevich